During the period when F. Scott Fitzgerald
was working in Hollywood, he was visited once by a fledgling writer who begged Fitzgerald
to teach him the ropes of writing a good script. The young man’s first lesson
was to compose a scene which involves only three characters; three different
coloured pens were assigned to write the lines, with each colour representing
one of the three characters. Enraged by the impression that Fitzgerald was mocking
his inexperience, the young writer asserted aloud his qualification for the job
and asked for a more constructive assignment. Fitzgerald’s response was one of
even greater rage: the young writer was summarily dismissed on the ground of
his irreverence for, what Fitzgerald considered, the rudiments of
screenwriting.
The
virtue of Fitzgerald’s little exercise finds its most manifest justification in
Ernst Lubitsch’s films, which regularly explore, often in a tone of frivolity
or thinly-disguised sarcasm, the conflicts and the absurd dynamic of the ménage à trois. With their emphasis on the consonance that
springs from the perpetual dissonance within the triangle – a contrapuntal
device that is commonly found in the 19th century “comedy of
errors,” wherein the intricate web of relationships between the characters is
always underpinned by an intangible, almost inborn, equilibrium – those films are
the equivalent of a Monet’s painting: an exuberant feast of colours which aims
to give the impression of joy and elegance. The colours are the characters and
their utterances; to fuse them together yields the challenge of creating order
out of a group of warring elements – hence the objective of Fitzgerald’s
exercise: that a good play should be a piece of uncluttered artwork as it is a
euphonious symphony.
Lubitsch’s films prior the enforcement of MPPD (Motion
Picture Production Code) make freer use of comedy’s malleability to indulge in,
often fleetingly and still under the guise of respectability, some ribald
humour. After all, comedy, according to Henri Bergson, denotes a particular
situation where an individual is startled out of his usual flexible movement.
In a broader sense, comedy operates invariably outside the norm, and is indeed licensed
to violate the moral code. Morality in Lubitsch’s early features is a concern
that is shorn of even its residual value: Maurice Chevalier, started with The Love Parade (1929), Lubitsch’s first
sound musical, routinely portrayed the role of an amorous rake whose pursuit of
happiness and good fortune are rarely encumbered by his amoral exploits.
Trouble in
Paradise (1932), by many
accounts Lubitsch’s best, almost flawless film, gives the flouting of morality
an implausibly elegant touch. Gaston and Lily are a thieving pair who set their
target on a widowed duchess. Trouble soon invades their paradisiac relationship
when Gaston inconveniently falls in love with the duchess. Posing as a suave
baron, Gaston, played by Herbert Marshall, speaks mellifluously and with a
taste for delicate wit; he is generally grave in manner and graceful in
deportation. This façade of a stolid bourgeois gent accords a new meaning to elegance:
that the attribute is sometimes a facile means for deception and is therefore possessed
of a false value.
It is not typical for Lubitsch to be passing any personal
comments or judgements of his subject. His comedies are so suffused with a heady
joyousness that any possibly more serious, sobering overtones become
automatically an incidental source of comedy. The motif of a “closed door” is the
director’s cheeky response to the society’s squeamishness for frank sexual
matters. In Trouble in Paradise the “closed
door” moments are deliberately made plain: when Gaston and Lily first meet and
fall for one another, they retreat to the hotel room for their night, and next
a hand is seen hanging a privacy sign on the doorknob; and during the courtship
between Gaston and duchess, those two are often caught (by the stupefied butler)
emerging together from one room, and entering and closing the door into
another.
That comedy without its hidden complexity cannot generate
an infinite source of genuine laughter is the unavowed creed which Lubitsch
consistently follows. Arguably the hallmark of the director’s career, Trouble in Paradise is a jewel whose innocence
and purity grow with age, and emit an especially dazzling incandescent when we
view it today, in a time when laughter is becoming a piece of sweet music so
rarely heard.
Comments
Post a Comment