Skip to main content

Review: Rebel Without a Cause (1955)



According to Albert Camus, rebels are not egotistical individuals. For an act of rebellion to succeed, suffering must be seen as a collective experience. The dictum, whatever its words, is invariably along the line of “I rebel – therefore we exist.” Any occasional indulgence in individual self-interest would derail the movement from its primary motivations, which comprise, above all, a resolute denial of superior authority and a dogged pursuit of the common good. For a rebel, his final choices inevitably boil down to either “All” or “Nothing” – all of his appeals answered and sufficiently taken care of, or to concede defeat, which means, in many cases, death: “Better to die on one’s feet than to live on one’s knee.”

The Rebel was published in 1951, a seminal essay that heralded the upcoming “age of revolt”, which, as history shows, has soon evolved into a subculture of its own. A growing interest in challenging the entrenched, antediluvian societal values and traditions gripped the prevalent mindsets of the 1950s; it is an era with the proliferation of fictional works that fell under the rubric of transgressive literature, such as Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, Nabokov’s Lolita, Burroughs’ Junkie, Kerouac’s On the Road, Ginsberg’s Howl. In those works and their likes, youths are often cast alternately as the menace and the saving grace of the crumbling moral universe. Rebel Without a Cause, bearing the bona fide stamp of the ‘50s, was however not the first Nicolas Ray’s film that dealt with the subject of teenager. His debut, They Live by Night, is a “couple on the run” noir centers on two young desperadoes (although both O’ Donnell and Granger were in their 20s when the film was shot, and the age of their characters were not specified), and is, in many respects, a superior production. But it is Rebel which has been widely regarded as the one setting the tone and the pattern for a spate of “juvenile delinquents” dramas that followed. 

Comparing with its precursor, Benedek’s The Wild OneRebel is even more animated and progressive in its representation of the volatile, angst-ridden teen spirit. This can be largely accredited to the contrasting coloration of the imagery, to the effect that James Dean’s red jacket clashes so garishly with the enveloping night shades, in the way that his character clashes with the bullies of the school, whose instinctive pugilism is an old trait he tries sedulously to steer clear of; and also to the story’s flirtation with sexual confusion (Wood’s character’s seemingly incestuous relationship with her father, and Mineo’s character’s affection, bordering on hero-worship, for Dean’s character). The latter concern, viewed with a less hidebound perspective of now, can be easily dismissed as incidental character features that bear no relevance except as within the narrative. But for the moviegoers of 1955, these moments may not likely to go by without eliciting a few frowns or nervous laughter. 

On the whole, Rebel has not aged well especially in terms of its emphasis, perhaps ironic, on the primacy of patriarchal ideology. The wrenching conversation that Dean’s character has with his father – obliquely blaming his insubordination on his father’s weak nature - is enough a suggestion of the former’s hidden mental issues. Many of the dialogues also come across as stilted and tedious. The mise-en-scène of the three main characters in a dilapidated mansion, where they hide from the school bullies who are avenging for the accidental death of their friend, is a woeful missed opportunity for something more subtle and symbolic. The fact that the story takes place a little over 24 hours should not really bear on the rushed pace of the overall production but, in this case, it may somehow account for the majority of the film’s shortcomings. 

The film remains a favorite among the audience and the director himself nonetheless, and, judging solely on Dean’s spellbinding portrayal of a troubled but empathetic character, it surely earns its place in American film history as one of the iconic and edgy tributes to an important time and culture. In terms of visual style and techniques, Rebel also anticipates Ray’s next masterpiece, Bigger Than Life

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: To Be or Not to Be (1942)

  In  Eichmann in Jerusalem  (1963), Hannah Arendt attributes the criminal mind of Nazi functionary Adolf Eichmann to a “sheer thoughtlessness - something by no means identical with stupidity…”  A Report on the Banality of Evil , which is the book’s subtitle, introduces a kind of evil - the worst conceivable kind in human history - that departs from the “radical evil” that is at the heart of Arendt’s  The Origins of Totalitarianism  (1951). Shortly after the publication of  Eichmann , Arendt wrote to philosopher Gershom Scholem:         […] I changed my opinion and do no longer speak of “radical evil.” […] It is        indeed my opinion now that now that evil is never “radical”, that it is only        extreme, and that it possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension […]        It is “thought-defying”, as I sai...

Review: 3 Women (1977)

  In search of what he called an “astral America” in the early 1980s, Jean Baudrillard came upon its ultimate symbol - the desert: “ Desert is simply that: an ecstatic critique of culture, an ecstatic form of disappearance.” This initial ecstasy soon gave way to sobering contemplation - of technology, the ravages of modernity, the vacuity of the American dream, the mindless luxury of civilisation…”All societies end up wearing masks,” Baudrillard pronounces, tying his observation in with the premise of his seminal work,  Simulacra and Simulation , published just a few years back, that “artifice is at the very heart of reality.”   Baudrillard’s Delphic prose, which comprises the book  America , is echoed in the strange, banal imagery of  3 Women  (1977). The locales were Palm Springs and Desert Hot Springs - arid plains where spirit decayed and hopes foundered. As is frequently the case, the drab physical landscape triggers an inverse response from the psycho...

Review: Playtime (1967)

  Having left his sister’s family at the end of  Mon Oncle  (1958), a bittersweet coda which I take to symbolise in some way the irretrievable loss of an age of innocence, Monsieur Hulot, Jacques Tati’s beloved and bumbling alter ego, finds himself amongst other ill-adapted, increasingly mechanised denizens in a near-futuristic Paris -  Playtime  (1967), Tati’s penultimate full-length feature and arguably his best, involved a constructed set so lavish and enormous that the director was near bankrupt when he finished the film, three years after its start date. The so-called “Tativille” blends the Kafkesque with an impersonal internationalism; the scope of vision is at once grand and restrictive - there is space within a wide interior space and, as evidenced by a now canonical image of Hulot overlooking a grid of office cubicles (this anticipated by at least 20 years the dominance of such design), each inhabitant of the space seems contented and in a way codepende...