Skip to main content

Review: When a Woman Ascends the Stairs (1960)

 



Made at the tail end of a decade marked by the nation’s slow recovery from war and its subsequent democratisation, Mikio Naruse’s When a Woman Ascends the Stairs(1960) addresses a subject at once bold and timely: the travails of womanhood in a patriarchal society. Social commentary was primarily what Naruse aimed for but in place of irony and satire one finds, by turns, empathy and a dispassionate understanding of the still repressive mores of ‘50’s Tokyo. This apparent contradictory tone in a sense parallels the heroine’s central conflict in regards to financial independence and the inevitable loss of dignity and personal values that comes with it.

 

Keiko, lovingly called “mama” by her friends and customers, struggles to keep afloat as a bar hostess in Ginza, the locus of Tokyo’s cocktail tradition, amidst a growing shift of business trend that promotes a more accentuated fusion of alcohol and sex. Widowed from a young age, Keiko adheres to a strict moral code that forbids her to give herself to any man, a source of both frustration and fascination to her many suitors. Female chastity, a misplaced ideal especially in Keiko’s line of work, takes on varying connotations: it is innocence, to be pounced on by the crooked; a fortification ready to be assailed and shattered; a sacredness, a virtue that inflames the desire to possess. Ultimately, it must be given away, in the sense that beauty is there simply to be sullied. In one of the powerful sequences of the film, Keiko, her defense finally conquered by a man to whom her love is unrequited, concedes defeat by way of raw emotions: “I had a dream that I was crying. When I woke up I really was crying.”

 

The material and the subject may easily lend themselves to the service of a melodrama, but Naruse, true to his characteristic style, opts for an understated portrayal that presents Keiko as neither a victim nor a victor of her time. Whereas Fellini’s Nights of Cabiria(1957), released three years prior to Naruse’s film and widely regarded as its companion piece, trumpets the interiorisation of everyman, Naruse treats emotional matters as ultimately dictated by a degree of privacy. The narrative is punctuated with Keiko’s occasional monologues, which compose chiefly of succinct, matter-of-fact statements of the episodic events, much like the title cards of a silent film but without the customary wry humour. 

 

Partially informed by the French New Wave, the film refrains from a ponderous tempo that normally accompanies such type of storytelling. Like Goddard and Varda, Naruse gamely blends the funereal with the joyful: the projected nonchalance connotes a way of living modeled on the determinist presupposition of life’s ultimate futility. With Keiko, the director’s prism is nonetheless empathetic, and this may also due in a large part to an exquisite performance by Naruse’s regular, Hideko Takamine. The film’s coda - Keiko ascending the stairs of the bar and braving the customers with a smile - has long been held a trenchant and pioneering claim on proto-feminism in Japan, but in light of the prevailing tone of restraint and emotional detachment, it seems rather an ad-hoc dignification that the film can do without.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: To Be or Not to Be (1942)

  In  Eichmann in Jerusalem  (1963), Hannah Arendt attributes the criminal mind of Nazi functionary Adolf Eichmann to a “sheer thoughtlessness - something by no means identical with stupidity…”  A Report on the Banality of Evil , which is the book’s subtitle, introduces a kind of evil - the worst conceivable kind in human history - that departs from the “radical evil” that is at the heart of Arendt’s  The Origins of Totalitarianism  (1951). Shortly after the publication of  Eichmann , Arendt wrote to philosopher Gershom Scholem:         […] I changed my opinion and do no longer speak of “radical evil.” […] It is        indeed my opinion now that now that evil is never “radical”, that it is only        extreme, and that it possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension […]        It is “thought-defying”, as I said, because thought tries to reach some depth,        to go to the roots, and the moment it concerns itself with evil, it is frustrated       because there is nothing. That is

Review: Playtime (1967)

  Having left his sister’s family at the end of  Mon Oncle  (1958), a bittersweet coda which I take to symbolise in some way the irretrievable loss of an age of innocence, Monsieur Hulot, Jacques Tati’s beloved and bumbling alter ego, finds himself amongst other ill-adapted, increasingly mechanised denizens in a near-futuristic Paris -  Playtime  (1967), Tati’s penultimate full-length feature and arguably his best, involved a constructed set so lavish and enormous that the director was near bankrupt when he finished the film, three years after its start date. The so-called “Tativille” blends the Kafkesque with an impersonal internationalism; the scope of vision is at once grand and restrictive - there is space within a wide interior space and, as evidenced by a now canonical image of Hulot overlooking a grid of office cubicles (this anticipated by at least 20 years the dominance of such design), each inhabitant of the space seems contented and in a way codependent on this inviolable en

Review: Angel (1937)

Billy Wilder, by way of dubious compliment, says of the master of early humane comedy: “Ernst Lubitsch, who could do more with a closed door than most of today’s directors can do with an open fly, would have had big problems in this market.” [i] The time was 1975 and Wilder’s observation betrays his concealed repugnance at the contemporary film scene. As is natural to the law of history, the past decays and whatever that has been salvaged from complete obliteration is bound to seem a little peculiar to the posterity. Wilder in the 1970s was coming to terms - although not without certain resentment - with the expected depletion of creative ideas brought on by old age and a growing sense of alienation from the prevailing cultural climate. Lubitsch, on the other hand, had his name and legacy established but his films in a steady process of obsolescence.  There is a misplaced tendency nowadays to view those films, which enjoy a resurgence of interest, as lighthearted and slightly whimsical