Skip to main content

Review: Trouble in Paradise (1932)




During the period when F. Scott Fitzgerald was working in Hollywood, he was visited once by a fledgling writer who begged Fitzgerald to teach him the ropes of writing a good script. The young man’s first lesson was to compose a scene which involves only three characters; three different coloured pens were assigned to write the lines, with each colour representing one of the three characters. Enraged by the impression that Fitzgerald was mocking his inexperience, the young writer asserted aloud his qualification for the job and asked for a more constructive assignment. Fitzgerald’s response was one of even greater rage: the young writer was summarily dismissed on the ground of his irreverence for, what Fitzgerald considered, the rudiments of screenwriting.

The virtue of Fitzgerald’s little exercise finds its most manifest justification in Ernst Lubitsch’s films, which regularly explore, often in a tone of frivolity or thinly-disguised sarcasm, the conflicts and the absurd dynamic of the ménage à trois. With their emphasis on the consonance that springs from the perpetual dissonance within the triangle – a contrapuntal device that is commonly found in the 19th century “comedy of errors,” wherein the intricate web of relationships between the characters is always underpinned by an intangible, almost inborn, equilibrium – those films are the equivalent of a Monet’s painting: an exuberant feast of colours which aims to give the impression of joy and elegance. The colours are the characters and their utterances; to fuse them together yields the challenge of creating order out of a group of warring elements – hence the objective of Fitzgerald’s exercise: that a good play should be a piece of uncluttered artwork as it is a euphonious symphony.

Lubitsch’s films prior the enforcement of MPPD (Motion Picture Production Code) make freer use of comedy’s malleability to indulge in, often fleetingly and still under the guise of respectability, some ribald humour. After all, comedy, according to Henri Bergson, denotes a particular situation where an individual is startled out of his usual flexible movement. In a broader sense, comedy operates invariably outside the norm, and is indeed licensed to violate the moral code. Morality in Lubitsch’s early features is a concern that is shorn of even its residual value: Maurice Chevalier, started with The Love Parade (1929), Lubitsch’s first sound musical, routinely portrayed the role of an amorous rake whose pursuit of happiness and good fortune are rarely encumbered by his amoral exploits.

Trouble in Paradise (1932), by many accounts Lubitsch’s best, almost flawless film, gives the flouting of morality an implausibly elegant touch. Gaston and Lily are a thieving pair who set their target on a widowed duchess. Trouble soon invades their paradisiac relationship when Gaston inconveniently falls in love with the duchess. Posing as a suave baron, Gaston, played by Herbert Marshall, speaks mellifluously and with a taste for delicate wit; he is generally grave in manner and graceful in deportation. This façade of a stolid bourgeois gent accords a new meaning to elegance: that the attribute is sometimes a facile means for deception and is therefore possessed of a false value.

It is not typical for Lubitsch to be passing any personal comments or judgements of his subject. His comedies are so suffused with a heady joyousness that any possibly more serious, sobering overtones become automatically an incidental source of comedy. The motif of a “closed door” is the director’s cheeky response to the society’s squeamishness for frank sexual matters. In Trouble in Paradise the “closed door” moments are deliberately made plain: when Gaston and Lily first meet and fall for one another, they retreat to the hotel room for their night, and next a hand is seen hanging a privacy sign on the doorknob; and during the courtship between Gaston and duchess, those two are often caught (by the stupefied butler) emerging together from one room, and entering and closing the door into another.


That comedy without its hidden complexity cannot generate an infinite source of genuine laughter is the unavowed creed which Lubitsch consistently follows. Arguably the hallmark of the director’s career, Trouble in Paradise is a jewel whose innocence and purity grow with age, and emit an especially dazzling incandescent when we view it today, in a time when laughter is becoming a piece of sweet music so rarely heard.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: To Be or Not to Be (1942)

  In  Eichmann in Jerusalem  (1963), Hannah Arendt attributes the criminal mind of Nazi functionary Adolf Eichmann to a “sheer thoughtlessness - something by no means identical with stupidity…”  A Report on the Banality of Evil , which is the book’s subtitle, introduces a kind of evil - the worst conceivable kind in human history - that departs from the “radical evil” that is at the heart of Arendt’s  The Origins of Totalitarianism  (1951). Shortly after the publication of  Eichmann , Arendt wrote to philosopher Gershom Scholem:         […] I changed my opinion and do no longer speak of “radical evil.” […] It is        indeed my opinion now that now that evil is never “radical”, that it is only        extreme, and that it possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension […]        It is “thought-defying”, as I sai...

Review: Playtime (1967)

  Having left his sister’s family at the end of  Mon Oncle  (1958), a bittersweet coda which I take to symbolise in some way the irretrievable loss of an age of innocence, Monsieur Hulot, Jacques Tati’s beloved and bumbling alter ego, finds himself amongst other ill-adapted, increasingly mechanised denizens in a near-futuristic Paris -  Playtime  (1967), Tati’s penultimate full-length feature and arguably his best, involved a constructed set so lavish and enormous that the director was near bankrupt when he finished the film, three years after its start date. The so-called “Tativille” blends the Kafkesque with an impersonal internationalism; the scope of vision is at once grand and restrictive - there is space within a wide interior space and, as evidenced by a now canonical image of Hulot overlooking a grid of office cubicles (this anticipated by at least 20 years the dominance of such design), each inhabitant of the space seems contented and in a way codepende...

Review: Black Narcissus (1947)

Wallace Stevens writes in “Imagination as Value”: “The truth seems to be that we live in concepts of the imagination before reason has established them.” Both imagination and reason are the chief mechanisms of constructing our worldview: postulated first by imagination and henceforth affirmed by reason. Elsewhere Stevens talks of noble art as “imagination pressing back against the pressure of reality,” acknowledging creativity as the potential force of disentangling men from the fetters of mundanity. These two meditative epigrams posit our perceptions of the world as shaped largely by imagination- not that of a virginal imagination perhaps but one that is refined by the developing of a cognition. But, one may ask, what is the genesis of our cognition? Is it yet another product of the imaginative faculty? Or is it also partly in thrall to the tyranny of reason? In the midst of such paradoxical argument a plausible interpretation arises: imagination and reason are, in essence, two s...